The Attack on Marijuana During the 1930s
The Attack on Marijuana During the 1930s
How did America fall for the government’s reefer madness? Chris Calton explains how junk science, overt racism, and myths of bloodthirsty soldiers all played a role in the criminalization of marijuana in America.
For further reading, a Bibliographical Essay is available at https://mises.org/EC1Bib
Historical Controversies is available online at:
https://Mises.org/HCPod
RSS: https://mises.org/itunes/622
iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/historical-controversies/id1304510096?mt=2
Google Play: https://play.google.com/music/m/I3vmki7pz7jxond4x7qx5dfjv7y?t=Historical_Controversies
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/misesmedia/sets/historical-controversies
Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/s?fid=147145
Music: “On the Ground” by Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com), licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
Hello guys, I posted this blog post for Weed Smokers Newbies and figured to share it with you. I would appreciate your comments and feedback in the post’s comment section. And please share it if you like it π Thanks a million. https://www.monroeblvd.com/blogs/lifestyle/first-time-smoking-weed
Socialism works if you poke your eyes out
Young marijuana leaves can be boiled and eaten like spinach—-they don’t contain any THC.
This is great. I hope this is going to be a regular thing the Institute puts out.
Now we are anxious for the next episode …
A suggestion for strategy. Use catchy thumbnails that will draw ppl in who have never heard of Mises or the narrator. Instead of podcasts make them as YouTube episodes with pictures and video. This will garner way more views and attention. You could grab the non libertarian with this type of content.
Keep these shows coming! Also, Ron Paul 2020!!
Dope, whatever it’s form is pretty stupid unless it’s for medical purposes. Fortunately, MJ has turned out to be relatively harmless. It’s a waste of time much like TV or Movies. A little more concerned about strains and growing techniques that raise the THC concentration that I’ve heard talk about.
Probably be a footnote in history something like: Gains popularity mostly because it is prohibited.
I have heard that the beer, liquor, big tobacco and big pharmaceutical companies blocked Marijuana legalization over the decades too with lobbying as they were worried about it stealing market share.
Great presentation, Chris, thank you!
If I may add some data I encountered when composing my article ‘REAL Warriors Oppose the Stateβs War on Cannabis’ for The American Daily Herald several years ago (link to the republished article in my blog below; the Herald’s been defunct for the past couple of years). The information I came across is fascinating, and dovetails with much of the information you discuss in this video. You’ll recognize some of the names, some may be new
Regarding the criminalization of cannabis that really took off in 1937:
"Cui bono?
William Randolph Hearst, for one. As a media mogul of the time, heΒ
jumped enthusiastically on the anti-cannabis bandwagon. As a publishing
magnate, he was in an ideal position to use the proven technique of yellow journalism
to whip up a frenzy of sensationalist anti cannabis sentiment in the
public mind, and these were spectacularly successful in selling huge
numbers of Hearst publications. Lurid tales of violence, sexual deviance
and assorted petty crime soon became a regular sight in his
publications, and as expected they were often attributed to the already
marginalized minorities. Hearst was a man of the times in his racist
attitudes common to many Americans of that era, harboring a vitriolic
hatred of Hispanics, Mexicans especially, blacks, and other minorities.
In addition, he was
* especially hostile to Mexicans after losing about
800,000 acres of prime timberland, a major source of raw material for
the newsprint needed by his publishing empire, to Mexican rebel Pancho Villa during the Mexican Revolution.’ *
While hemp did indeed threaten DuPont’s nylon, primarily due to the introduction of the hemp decorticator device that allowed much faster extraction of hemp’s industrial fiber from the plant than ever before, it was Hearst’s vendetta against Mexicans (which was only augmenting his original xenophobia of them) that was a primary driver in his yellow journalism campaign.
You make a good point that I found too in researching this subject, specifically in the tie between Anslinger and DuPont:
"There was an industrial incentive to eliminate hemp, too, though perhaps
not as powerful a motivation as using its illegality as a xenophobic
social control: the DuPont chemical company had just patented the
worldβs first synthetic fiber, nylon, and had a large financial stake in
promoting it over older natural fibers like hemp. By an interesting
coincidence, that intrepid drug fighter Harry Anslinger just happened to
be the nephew of Andrew Mellon, one of the richest men in Americaβ¦who
was heavily invested in DuPont. Just how significant this is as a factor
in the war on cannabis is difficult to say, but when trying to
determine criminal culpability in a case, investigators look for motive
and opportunity. Anslinger certainly seems to have had both."
Β During the actual Congressional hearings, the real fun begins:
Β *βAfter two puffs on a marijuana cigarette, I was turned into a bat.β*
~ Dr. James C. Munch, testifying before Congressional hearings on the Marijuana Tax Act (1937)
"During Congressional hearings for one of the first truly decisive
steps in what would become known as the War on Drugs, the Marihuana Tax
Act of 1937, only two doctors were called upon to give testimony. One, a
Dr. Woodward, testified against the Act for various reasons on behalf
of the A.M.A.. That organization felt that the bill had been hastily and
secretly prepared, as well as the fact that even then the benefits of
cannabis were acknowledged by physicians prescribing cannabis, retail pharmacists selling cannabis, and medical cannabis cultivation
and manufacturing. He was politely told to shut up and go away. While
details are sketchy, the animosity seems to have been mutual, the A.M.A.
strongly doubted the governmentβs wild claims of insanity, death and addiction made by the billβs proponents, most notably those concocted by Harry Anslinger, newly appointed head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and a vehement prohibitionist for his entire professional life.
The other was the Dr. Munch quoted above, a pharmacologist from
Temple University, who not only testified that a taste of cannabis had
turned him into a bat, but expanded on this claim, asserting that once
transmogrified he βflew around the room
for 15 minutes before finding himself at the bottom of a 200-foot high
ink well.β Not bad for a story concocted decades before Rod Serlingβs
Twilight Zone!"
Β I hope my added data helps flesh out your research, just as yours has augmented mine!
Link to the republished article: https://libertyonwheels.com/2016/08/06/real-warriors-oppose-the-states-war-on-cannabis/
Cops force young woman onto the ground in a parking lot, pull off her panties and digitally rape her because they said they could smell marijuana.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyanpxw7v30&t=1s